Culture of Philanthropy: 5 Steps in Demonstrating Donor Engagement

DATE

Picture of Matt Wasserman

Matt Wasserman

I recently wrote about five steps in building a culture of philanthropy and breaking down silos and creating bridges for your colleagues to cross into the realm of philanthropy and embrace fundraising best practices. Here are the five as a refresher.

This article takes a deeper dive into the third step — explain the process of donor engagement, which is a matter of showing that it takes time, finesse, and a lot of work. It’s demonstrating both the art and process of engaging with donors in building a culture of philanthropy. There are five main components that you should review with your colleagues, including:

  1. It is relationship-based
  2. How everyone is different
  3. The various types of gifts
  4. Affinity to the organization
  5. The amount of time it takes to move through the fundraising cycle

1. It’s relationship-based: first and foremost, building relationships is fundamental in fundraising, and it’s the cornerstone of all activity and efforts. How can you demonstrate this to your non-fundraising colleagues? My spouse would tell me it’s about communication, listening, and understanding…hmmm…enough said. The key here is to understand why the donor has given or is considering investing in your organization, and what specifically (program, service, experience) resonated with him/her. It’s also about keeping the communication going with someone you don’t often see, engaging in various activities and touch points such as personal meeting or tours, letters, emails, and events. Make sure it’s two-way communication. Oh yeah, and did I mention listening.

2. Everyone is different: a critical element of the process in understanding donors is that as people we are all different. We are all human, and that can get lost when it’s time to fundraise, when it’s time to sit down with someone and ask them to invest in your organization. So, how do you bring this across to the people in your organization who don’t fundraise and might look at all these individuals as one-dimensional “targets”? How do you get the folks in your organization to realize something they probably know but are thrown off by the looming prospect of fundraising? 

One method is to think about personality traits, age, and other psychographic traits of the person. You can ask them to take personality profile tests such as DISC, Myers-Briggs, or Colors, and connect with their colleagues. These personality assessments can create a great understanding and tools when transferred to regular donor engagement. Additionally, you should discuss how various personality traits will react to a meeting and being asked. There are many tools and takeaways from these surveys that detail interaction with different personalities.

3. The various types of gifts: It’s also important for your non-fundraising colleagues to understand that there are different types of gifts. You know them as planned, annual, major, corporate, and foundation. Maybe your non-fundraising peers could use a refresher. They might not be able to explain the difference between a planned gift and an annual appeal or realize the many engagement processes or strategies for securing various gifts. It will be important to explain the difference between donors who respond to mailings and give annually, and the in-person interaction required with major gift donors who spend time considering gifts.

4. Affinity to the organization: along with the types of gifts, are the levels of commitment donors have to your organization. This varies from the donor who has a limited understanding of your organization and participates through an event or annual volunteer effort, testing the organization to see if it’s a place they believe in and wish to have their life. As opposed to the donor who is completely committed to your organization, volunteering regularly, giving annually, and feels a sense of ownership and self-fulfillment from being involved. It’s important to explain this to avoid chasing dollars with donors with low affinity and developing unrealistic expectations. Through comparing various donors anonymously, or using a composite set of donors, you can demonstrate levels of affinity or connection to the organization, and which donors should be a priority focus because of their high affinity, and which donors have limited or no interest, and therefore should not be a priority regardless of their wealth.

5. Setting expectations of timing: is among the very critical items of donor engagement that should be defined. While we would like for donors to give immediately and right when we ask, that’s rarely the case. Your colleagues might not know that making a major gift is a major decision, and that decision-making process takes time. This could include everything from seeking input and advice from family members and gaining guidance from legal and financial advisors, to considering the effectiveness and impact of your organization. Additionally, let them know that it takes time to engage donors in your organization to a point where they are bought-in to your mission, vision, ability to execute, and be good stewards of their investment.

There’s a lot of competing attention for donors’ time and engagement, and it will take several touch points to bring someone to the point where a level of trust and commitment are built to make a substantial gift. Your colleagues who don’t fundraise are usually only aware of donors who give through methods such as events, mail, and other forms of direct solicitation. Additionally, they read about mega-gifts in the press that make it sound like decisions are made on the spot. Clearly outline a time frame of engagement and solicitation of major gift donors, including multiple touch points over an extended timeframe.

Teaching your colleagues the best practices of engaging donors can be a lot to go through. However, it’s important in gaining an understanding of the process. Building a culture of philanthropy will help set expectations and provide a roadmap for how they can help in developing stronger donor relationships at your organization.

These are just some of the methods in which you can talk about engaging donors, and I invite you to comment on other ideas and experiences that you feel would be effective.

In building a culture of philanthropy, it’s important for your colleagues to understand the art and science of donor engagement. Once they understand this, they are better prepared to start building stronger relationships with donors to your organization.

If you would like to learn more about engaging your staff in the fundraising process, please get in touch with me at matt@makephilanthropywork.com.

More
resources

Meet Lauren

Lauren Sisneros

Lauren Sisneros is the founder of LS Consultants, LLC, a consulting firm that provides strategic advising and interim management support to nonprofit and education-focused organizations. A mission-driven leader with over 20 years of experience, Lauren brings a deep commitment to advancing equity across education, workforce development, and public policy.

With a keen understanding of complex systems and a results-oriented approach, Lauren partners with organizations to develop and implement strategies that are both effective and sustainable. Through LS Consultants, she delivers hands-on guidance in program management, board and stakeholder engagement, and leadership transitions, empowering mission-aligned teams to grow, adapt, and create lasting community impact.

Lauren has collaborated with a diverse portfolio of clients, including the Prosperity Denver Fund, Contractor Academy, Education Commission of the States, and Strong Start to Finish. Her work is grounded in a strong foundation of project management, nonprofit leadership, and policy analysis.

She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Colorado State University–Pueblo and a Master’s in Education from Colorado State University Global. Lauren is also a proud graduate of the University of Denver’s Latino Leadership Institute, a fellowship preparing Latino professionals for positions of influence across Colorado, and the Denver Metro Chamber Leadership Foundation’s Leadership Program, an 11-month civic leadership experience.

A Colorado native born and raised in the San Luis Valley, Lauren now lives in Lakewood, Colorado. She is a proud mother of two college students and a devoted grandmother who cherishes time with her family.

Throughout her career, Lauren has remained deeply dedicated to expanding access to opportunity, especially for underserved communities. Her work continues to center on shaping systems that are inclusive, community-driven, and equity-focused.

Meet

Kyle Christensen

Kyle Christensen, M.P.A., is a program leader, facilitator, and trainer with more than 25 years of experience designing and delivering transformative learning experiences that advance leadership, civic engagement, and organizational change. He specializes in designing and evaluating leadership programs, facilitating team and organizational development, and guiding strategic planning processes that align purpose with measurable impact.

As founder of The Connected Leadership Project and consultant with Arrow Performance Group, Kyle partners with organizations such as the State of Colorado, CiviCO, and the University of Denver to design experiential leadership programs that build resilience, connection, and innovation. He also serves as program director for Leadership Veteran, an 8-month leadership initiative advancing the skills of professionals serving veteran communities.

Previously, Kyle directed Colorado State University Douglas County Extension, where he launched Colorado’s first Juntos 4-H program to expand pathways to higher education for Latinx youth and families. He also led the Family Leadership Training Institute of Colorado and has worked with institutions such as Peace Corps (Moldova), NYU Steinhardt, Centrul Educatia 2000+ (Romania), and the Council for Economic Education.

Kyle’s facilitation expertise is rooted in adult learning theory and supported by credentials such as Emergenetics, Strategic Doing, and Technology of Participation. He has led statewide and national trainings, peer learning cohorts, needs assessment processes, and community-centered planning efforts across government, nonprofit, and education sectors.

He holds an M.P.A. from New York University’s Wagner School of Public Service and a graduate certificate in Learning and Development from the University of Denver’s College of Professional Studies.

Kyle believes that the workplace should focus on continuous learning and growth, inclusive engagement, and creating a sense of belonging. “Why wouldn’t we hope for work environments that align with our values and our professional and personal growth aspirations?” He brings curiosity, compassion, and clarity to every engagement, and is most inspired when people find their voice, connect with others, and lead boldly in collective service.

Meet

Jason Pemberton

Jason Pemberton is a multi-award winning facilitator, coach, independent executive board director, and strategist based in Denver, Colorado. Born in USA and raised in New Zealand, his entire career has been dedicated to Not-for-Profit and purpose-led organizations striving for high impact.

A series of catastrophic earthquakes in his home city of Christchurch, New Zealand, launched him into several years of disaster response, which, in turn, launched him into international consulting practice. He has worked in more than a dozen countries supporting companies, networks, and communities navigate through unexpected terrain for mutual benefit.

As a strategist and coach, he is pragmatic, direct, and clear, bringing his sharp mind and depth of thought to the fore whilst supporting groups to identify their own priorities and take charge of their future. His deep governance experience, coupled with professional training in positive psychology and related coaching accreditations, makes him highly effective at supporting teams of leaders and governors to find successful paths forward.

His time now is invested in supporting governance boards and senior leaders to succeed, and coaching technical experts and engineers on how to be skilled leaders of people.